Would you like to see some very sad graphs that illustrate why our financial system is in such dire straits? Of course you do. (HT: Lisa X)
What the blue line above shows is how much banks have borrowed from the Fed (the Fed’s BORROW index). You’ll notice (or maybe you won’t because of the small font size) that this graph goes back to 1910, with the gray bars reflecting when recessions occurred. You’ll also notice how that line basically doesn’t go anywhere through pretty much all of the 20th century, including even during the Great Depression, the economic crises of the 1970s and the early 1980s or the tech collapse in the early 2000s. Then, notice what happens at the right end of that graph – aka today. Yup, banks have so little capital left that they are now borrowing money from the Fed by the truckload.
But, wait. Borrowing from the Fed isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Maybe they’re borrowing it so they can lend it back out! Alas, this next chart shows that the borrowing is exactly what I just suggested – cash to cover the fact that the banks can barely cover what they owe:
Here, the blue line represents how much of a bank’s reserves are non-borrowed – or in other words, how much of its original deposits is a particular bank holding so as to make sure money comes out when you use an ATM – the Fed’s BOGNONBR index (no I’m not kidding on that acronym).
You usually expect this to be a certain percentage of what each bank is obligated to be able to cover (because the bank re-loans out most of the money that it has so that it can make money on interest). What you don’t expect, and never want to see, is when that number becomes negative – because what that means is that the bank’s own holdings can no longer cover its obligations – it has to borrow money just to make sure that money comes out of the ATM.
The combination of the two charts tells something quite horrifying – our banking system has no capacity to cover its own debts, and it is borrowing money like there’s no tomorrow to try to patch this up. If we want to fix the financial crisis, we need some way of helping to patch this horrible horrible gap. And how to do that is the $700 billion (or more) question.
Did you think emoticons are a modern phenomena of the Internet? Think again. A long long time ago (~120 years ago to be more precise), in a place not so far away… a typographist sought a new way to communicate emotion with his people and to thwart the threat of evil cartoonists… (HT: Comics Should be Good)
A guest post (the first!) by my good buddy, Anthony , who after a couple of minutes of brainstorming with me on what companies to offer $100 for and what we’d do to save them came up with this little bit:
Hi everybody, I’m Anthony, Ben’s partner in low-ball offers to disastrous companies. A couple of weeks have gone by and unfortunately it appears that no one has been willing to accept our $100 offer to run the next failing bank or company division (Damn that Dogbert…).
Now Ben and I are realists, we understand that companies may be reluctant to take advantage of our offer, but when you change CEOs only to find yourself looking at a share price of $0.20 (down 95.24% in 2008) and scrambling for ways to avoid Chapter 11; it just might be time for a major change. Yes, we’re talking to you, Circuit City.
Circuit City’s financial situation has deteriorated steadily since 2006. Revenue gains have been marginal in comparison to Best Buy’s rapid growth. In 2007 Circuit City incurred a loss of $8 million in stark contrast to Best Buy’s $1.37 billion in profits. If that weren’t bad enough in the most recent quarter (ending Aug 2008) Circuit City racked up over $200 million in losses. Total debt has increased steadily over the past three quarters and same store sales (a number showing sales that don’t come from new stores, making it a good sign of how well Circuit City is managing sales growth) fell 7.7% in FY2008. Adding insult to injury Bernard Sands recently pulled its recommendation for vendors to sell goods to Circuit City over concerns the retailer would be unable to pay. On the other hand, their top competitor, Best Buy, is flourishing with its revenue growing by double digits over the past four years. Clearly, something needs to be done.
Since “business as usual” is simply continuing to take on Best Buy on its own home turf, we believe the best method for reinvigorating sales is to provide consumers with a new consumer electronics store experience — one that acknowledges the rapid pace of development in consumer electronics and provides the consumer with a practical while flexible buying experience. This new store setup will differentiate Circuit City stores from the plethora of typical electronics retailers by emphasizing “platforms” rather than individual devices. The reason for this is that the rapid pace of technology makes it difficult for the typical consumer to always make fully informed purchasing decisions. This means that consumers may buy products which aren’t compatible with or don’t work well with one another (e.g. HDTVs and various speaker receivers). The wide range of electronics that these stores need to carry also make it very difficult for the store clerks to understand all the options that consumers may want.
What do we propose? Take a page straight out of IKEA’s playbook — instead of organizing the store by device (e.g. a TV section, a MP3 player section, etc.), organize the store into “platforms” — here is a hardcore gamer’s living room setup, here is a budget home office setup, here is a student setup, here is a always-on-the-go setup, etc. In each case, instead of highlighting specific devices, we would encourage Circuit City and its employees to highlight a particular electronics experience customized for a specific use. This would help Circuit City’s relations with its suppliers, as the suppliers already are attempting to target different products to different types of customers, and would serve as a useful service for customers who have no clear idea of which devices are tailored for them, nor how the devices can work together. Also, in much the same way that IKEA lets you customize specific pieces of the furniture, this store experience gives customers flexibility by presenting choices which don’t interfere with how the electronics work together (e.g. different colors, a slightly higher-end or cheaper device to substitute, etc.).
This new customer orientation also suggests a structure for a new, more useful website. Ben and I propose to integrate Circuit City’s website into its store business in a way that no store has ever done before. Whereas most companies operate their stores and websites separately, we would force Circuit City to not only organize the website in the same way that the store is (to help simplify things for customers), but to also tie them so closely together that a customer could quickly and easily use the website to schedule repairs and pickups, check on the availability of products in their local stores in real-time, download product information (e.g. manuals, flyers, drivers, etc.), and even check out ways to customize or replace specific pieces (e.g. a different color game controller, a slightly higher performance sub-woofer, etc.).
Neither of these initiatives are easy, nor do they represent all of the ideas that Ben and I have, but they are a good first step in how to save Circuit City’s sinking ship. As Circuit City spokesman Bill Cimino told the WSJ, “[t]he management team, board of directors, and its strategic financial advisers are conducting a comprehensive review of all aspects of our business to determine the best methods of accelerating our turnaround”.
In the classifieds on the web of the daily Iceland newspaper Mbl, you find hard currency for sale (US dollar, Danish kroner, and Euro) ranging from USD 300 to USD 12000. With the breakdown of the official exchange rates, the market has emerged.
I love the aesthetic here. It looks like just a commonplace eraser, but it packs a heckuva lot more functionality underneath, not to mention that it:
When the Kenyan president was asked to comment on his country being judged the most corrupt country in the world as judged by the ease and frequency at which bribery happened, the Kenyan president noted: “Actually, we were ranked second. We simply bribed the judges to make us first”
A joke I heard from work (am fairly sure none of it is true).
I believe Colin Powell does a pretty good job of explaining my views on the Obama-McCain election.
I personally have a very deep respect for John McCain — not just because of his heroism on the battlefield, but because of the bipartisan role he has played in the past. I think too many liberals have gotten swept up in election year politics, forgetting that their last presidential candidate John Kerry flirted (although probably insincerely) with the idea of having McCain as a running mate and forgetting the role McCain played in brokering deals with the DNC to deal with political gridlock.
But, even so, the way the recent election has been carried out has overcome my traditional distaste for both sides of the aisle:
These are not political arguments that I’m making. This is not about me disagreeing with McCain’s positions, as I find many of Obama’s positions equally wrong-headed. This is about common sense — how do you vote for a candidate whose party is practicing in some disgusting political practices and who nominated a woman who lacks the qualifications to even be the President’s secretary let alone his vice president.
With all the discussion about who would make a better President, Barack Obama or John McCain, one obvious candidate has been ignored — one who rises above them all. Who is this dark horse candidate who has proven himself to be the most deserving of the title of Commander-in-Chief? I’m speaking of none other than Victor von Doom — the one they call Dr. Doom.
What qualifications does he have?
Surely, at this point, there is no doubt in your mind who is the most competent and qualified man of the hour. So this November, go to the ballot and cast your vote for the one man who can bring America to greatness. And may Doom bless you all.
I recently started blogging with a couple of buddies over at the Xhibiting blog. The blog is basically a style blog where we post things which have caught our eye (we’re exhibiting them — get it? aren’t we clever?).
While the others focus on more stylish things, I tend to populate the blog with posts where I go ga-ga over gadgets. And, true to consultant form, I’ve posted some specs and pictures for RIM’s new Blackberry Bold and Blackberry Storm.
Now, if only I could find someone willing to give me one…
What is it that consultants do?
I’ve been asked that question many times — and the only answer I have is that we do whatever is needed to help solve management’s problems. But that’s always felt like a cop-out to me — because realistically speaking, everything we’re doing is either to make or edit some sort of Powerpoint slide.
This isn’t to be completely dismissive of the job — far from it. A great source of value that consultants add is to help dig through the information that a client already has (or knows exists) and then to repackage it in a way which is actionable to its management.
Of course, you can take a different view (hat tip: Dilbert — who else?)
Cha-ching!