You may or may not have heard Harvard’s decision to end Early Action, the program which allows applicants to apply earlier and also get an earlier, but non-binding decision from a school. While I don’t think this makes really that much of a difference (especially as Harvard has been revealed to be the top choice of students), this has apparently been on the minds of many colleges.
The amusing thing, to me, is that Harvard is being the first college to do this because:
“The old adage is, ‘When Harvard sneezes, everyone else gets pneumonia,’” said Bruce Breimer, school principal and director of college relations at the Collegiate School in New York. “It’s going to cause everyone else to re-evaluate.”
There’s an adage for that?
Got this off a facebook group
(this seems most pertinent to USC Med school)
It seems very amusing to me that there has been such a huge backlash against Facebook for the mini-feed feature. Yes, it makes it easier to stalk people, but to be frank, it’s not as if any of this information that is being published in the mini-feed is actually private. All of the information: relationship status change, who you friend, who you write wall comments on — all of it is accessible as long as you’re friends with someone. If anything, this is much more useful than checking my Friends page for vague “[person X] has updated their profile” comments. So what’s the big deal?
If you’re worried, then simple:
a. Don’t make frequent changes to your facebook account
b. De-friend people that you don’t want access to your mini-feed
c. This should have been a real concern from the moment you signed up for Facebook, but DON’T put stuff up there that you don’t want found out
Now, if you’re REALLY REALLY worried, and you use Firefox, get the Greasemonkey extension (which allows you to load scripts that can be found on http://userscripts.org/) and install the Facebook Mini-Feed Killer script.
Me? I’m looking forward to finding out how many times Jeb can change his relationship status in one day.
So says the Big Bad Read poll. Magneto came in at 11. And although I’ve never read it and not technically a comicbook villain, one of Neil Gaiman’s creations, The Other Mother (from his novel Coraline) came in at 7.
The Top 20:
1. Lord Voldemort, Harry Potter (J.K. Rowling)
2. Sauron, The Lord of the Rings (J.R.R. Tolkien)
3. Mrs. Coulter, His Dark Materials (Philip Pullman)
4. Lex Luthor, Superman (DC Comics)
5. The Joker, Batman (DC Comics)
6. Count Olaf, A Series of Unfortunate Events (Lemony Snicket)
7. The Other Mother, Coraline (Neil Gaiman)
8. The White Witch, The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe (C.S. Lewis)
9. Dracula, Dracula (Bram Stoker)
10. Artemis Fowl, Artemis Fowl (Eoin Colfer)
11. Magneto, X-Men (Marvel Comics)
12. Prof. Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes (Arthur Conan Doyle)
13. Zaphod Beeblebrox, Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (Douglas Adams)
14. Capt. Hook, Peter Pan (J.M. Barrie)
15. Napoleon the Pig, Animal Farm (George Orwell)
16. Heathcliff, Wuthering Heights (Emily Bronte)
17. Miss Trunchbull, Matilda (Roald Dahl)
18. Cruella de Vil, 101 Dalmations (Dodie Smith)
19. The Wicked Witch of the West, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (L. Frank Baum)
20. The Grinch, How the Grinch Stole Christmas (Dr. Seuss)
Poor Magneto … he got beaten out by an albino witch =/
I mentioned in a previous post about Google Earth’s efforts in Katrina about the amazing capacity for modern technology, especially information technology (IT, its not just for outsourcing to India), to devolve power from centralized bodies, letting private institutions and individuals act locally on levels never imagined before. Someone who worked at Google kindly left a comment on my blog mentioning another of Google’s projects inspired by their efforts in Katrina, Strong Angel III, to demonstrate what public-private partnerships can do in response to disasters. While previously, Strong Angel was a demonstration of civilian-military cooperative efforts in response to conflict scenarios, Strong Angel III was designed to see what larger partnerships could do in response to disaster scenarios (ie terrorist attack, hurricane, etc). Remarkably, if you check their objective list, you’ll find that not only did traditional deployment/civilian-military communications make the list of goals, but a huge number of internet, cell phone, and technological issues were looked into as integral parts of making disaster relief efforts more local and hence, more effective and prompt.
On the subject of IT changing the way society works, as I mentioned before, the dawn of the printing press made it no longer possible for governments to exercise complete autocratic authority — not when thousands of printing presses were churning out historical records and opinion pieces. This has only expanded in recent years with the internet revolution, as now, with instant messenging and the world-wide-web and blogging, people are, more than ever, free to write what they want and put it out there for the world to see. Its not just the elite who have access to this power anymore. The Google Blog recently described the publishing by a prominent blogger of a book called “55 Ways to Have Fun With Google” describing some fun google things that some people have heard of (ie Google Fight) and some of the lesser known things (ie Google Snake). That in and of itself is rather amusing, but the really cool thing was that the book was self-published with a new publishing service called Lulu.com which allows you to submit digital manuscripts for printing and publication and for listing on Google Book Search (which by the way now has copies of out-of-copyright books all for free!) and Amazon.
viva la internet!
In a previous post, I explained some of the multiple reasons that I love firefox and gave a list of some of the most useful extensions that I use. As I am always discovering new things, here are some of the additional discoveries I’ve made with Firefox which have made it all the more useful for me:
Anyone else have any firefox advice?
This is the most addictive game ever. Cute little bitmaps. With ninja powers. Duking it out — up to 8-character deathmatch. Chinese characters abound. FREEWARE. It doesn’t get much better (or worse, depending on your perspective — ie if you shouldn’t be wasting time) than this.
I love Ask Yahoo. The concept is simple — you submit questions to Yahoo who then uses the Yahoo search engine to dig up web pages which can answer the question. They’ve been answering questions like “Is Sherlock Holmes based on a real person?” or “How did ‘yellow’ come to refer to being a coward?” Its the best type of marketing in my mind (answering popular question, simultaneously de-mystifying and re-mystifying the technology, demonstrating a product’s usefulness, etc) and it even has its own RSS feed (which I’ve gladly subscribed to). My understanding is a number of other companies have also started providing this service (including “adult help” whatever that means… yeah, don’t think too hard about it), but thus far I just really like the stuff Ask Yahoo has put out in the past.
To answer the Sherlock Holmes question:
Sherlock Holmes was one smart crumpet. No matter how difficult the case, even the most devious criminals were inevitably caught — usually thanks to a detail noticed only by the great detective. Though we doubt any real person could ever possess Holmes’ incredible powers of deduction, his creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, did in fact base him on a real person.The Chronicles of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle explains. When Doyle was studying to be a doctor, Dr. John Bell was one of his professors. Holmes was particularly impressed with Bell’s talent for observation. In hopes of learning more about his patients and perhaps treating them more effectively, Bell would study their hands, look for tattoos, and listen for accents.
However, the similarities don’t end there. Like Holmes, Bell reportedly had an angular face and “shrewd eyes.” Additionally, both were Renaissance men, though their choice in hobbies differed. Bell enjoyed bird watching, sports, and poetry, while Holmes was never without his treasured violin.
But what of Sherlock’s unique name? Elementary, my dear Moriarty. This biography of Doyle suggests it was likely a simple hybrid of jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes and violinist Alfred Sherlock.